Sweet Classic High

Shipping and Returns

Related Styles
  Nike Studio Wrap Point Shoes

Nike Air Cage Advantage


Air Diamond Trainer


Air Max Cage Shoes


Air Max Run Lite 4


Nike Air Max Torch 4


Cheer Compete


Nike Cortez Leather Shoes


Flex Show TR 2


Nike Flight 13 Shoes


Free Edge TR


Free TR Fit 3 All Conditions


Hyperdunk 2013 TB



Nike Studio Wrap Print are women specific shoes which have extremely lightweight construction that you will barely feel them on your feet. These shoes have indoor built which allows you to use them in various indoor activities like Pilates, Barre, Dance and Yoga. The minimal design of these shoes delivers you barefoot feel and they are ideal for workout which are usually done barefooted. These shoes are made from super lightweight stretch foam which has crisscross design. The upper wraps around your feet specially under the heel and arch to deliver you personalized and secure fit. The upper has been made from single layer of mesh which offers excellent breathability and it keeps the interior cool and fresh. The upper is very lightweight and it molds as per the shape of your feet perfectly. The outsole has been fitted with silicon pattern which offers grip on multiple indoor surfaces. The outsole has pivot points which have been designed to allow easy spins and dance movements. These shoes comes with washing instructions so you can clean them easily for long term use and there is a garment bag in the package as well. These imported shoes weigh just 1.2 ounces as per size 9.5 which is super lightweight and you will barely feel them on your feet. This style can be found in these colors: Gamma Blue/ Mineral Teal/ Teal Tint/ Volt and Black/ Gamma Blue/ Electro Purple/ Black.




 View At Store


Buy Nike Studio Wrap Point

User Opinions

I haven't read every single comment, but the core idea was well expressed in a 2008 book by UC Irvine professor Richard Mckenzie, DEFENSE OF MONOPOLY: How Market Power Fosters Creative Productive. He also made the basic point that with true commodities, pricing power falls to zero and absent investment, risk, and profit margin... innovation fails. Whenever you have a profit (or a substantial profit) there is SOME kind of barrier which is SOME kind of monopoly or quasi monopoly. For example, I have a couple million miles on United Airlines, and they have a "monopoly" when I leave my house or office and I look for an airline they will treat me like gold and rebook me in 20 seconds after a canceled flight. It's different than "monopoly" with the cartoon obese guy in a tuxedo with a monocle and a money bag, but it's a kind of barrier to entry and monopoly, too. I hope McKenzie's book gets at least a footnote in Thiel (deserves more!), but Thiel isn't published yet, so I can't say. Economists refer to a temporary monopoly as the ideal circumstance for the entity. But big profits lead to others entering the field, thereby making the monopoly temporary and restoring competition to the marketplace and lowering prices and profits for the original entity that had the temporary monopoly.

Monopolies are undoubtedly great for the owners of the company, but, they aren't always good for the people that need the products. Some companies, such as Google and Microsoft, are good at keeping the cost of their products reasonable and the quality high, but others create problems with affordability or begin to rest on their laurels. In the end, I think competition is good for the market place and ultimately the consumer. Thus disproving the basic premise of his argument. The only way a "better monopoly can replace an existing monopoly" is they don't actually have a monopoly and they create competition.. This article is full of contradictions and warped logic. WSJ should have been ashamed to publish it as anything but an example of how not to develop an argument.

Google is a bad example of a monopoly. First of all, by the author's admission it doesn't have 100% of its market.  Second, it all depends, as he notes, on how you define the market. If Google doubled its prices tomorrow, my company would still use it, but to a greatly diminished degree there being many alternatives. Google would not collect as much in monopoly rents as a real monopoly would. A real monopoly is the municipal water company, although if it doubled its prices I could flush less. Peter is using the word monopoly because that is the language given to us by economists and because he knows that language is inaccurate and provoking. Let's transfer the argument into spiritual terms and provoke again. Like us, our businesses exist to express their souls. Humans and their creations thrive when they are distinct in their value within their context...to the point of unique identity and purpose. Unique people are not monopolies and nor are unique businesses. Consider Ferrari or Tesla. Each is distinct. Neither is a monopoly.

Taking my teleological tilt a bit further, the real purpose of economic competition is to eliminate our creations which aren't sufficiently distinct to be profitable. That turns capitalism into an ethical system in which humans further realize their souls. But it isn't often practiced that way or often intellectualized that way. Why? Because we often forget our own purpose and calling to be distinct, connected and valuable.


Also See These Styles Similar To Nike Sweet Classic High

Lunar IDV Trail Mid Nike Mach Runner Mercurial Veloce FG Nike Free Bionic BP
Roshe Run Stasis ACG Nike Studio Trainer Studio Wrap Point
Unify Strike Metal Shoes Nike Vapor Strike MCS Zoom Born Ready Zoom Terra Kiger


Note: We do not represent any affiliation or association with brand names like Nike mentioned on our website. We list information, reviews, critiques on footwear products and may provide link to 3rd party store where you can purchase product but we don't guarantee its availability.
  Contact Webmaster | Privacy Statement


Copyright © Sweet Classic High, All Rights Reserved.